1st Quarter Postal

By Denny Habecker

MEET RESULTS –

2018 1ST QUARTER POSTAL MEET

The 2018 1st Quarter Postal kicked off with 12 lifters doing some outstanding lifts. Eric Todd continues to show he will be tough to beat, while Amorkor Ollennuking was outstanding in women’s Division.

Meet Results:

1st Quarter Postal
January 1st to March 31st, 2018

Meet Director: Denny Habecker

Lifters with Certified Officials:
Eric Todd –  Certified Official Lance Foster
Chris Todd – Certified Official Eric Todd
Lance Foster – Certified Official Eric Todd
Calvin Helt- Certified Official Chad Ullom
Dean Ross – Certified Official Chad Ullom
Chad Ullom- Certified Official Denny Habecker
Aidan Habecker – Certified Official Denny Habecker

Lifters with non-certified Officials:
John Douglas
Stephen Santangelo
R.J. Jackson
Denny Habecker
Amorkor Ollennuking

The Lifts: Clean & Press-Heels Together, Dead Hang Snatch, One Arm Clean & Jerk

MENS DIVISION

Eric Todd                       43   – 255 Lbs.    251     176     116-R       543      443.81

John Douglas                 54   – 310 Lbs.    205     165     105-R       475      390.58

Stephen R. Santangelo   65   – 158 Lbs.    115      90       65- R       270      350.37

Calvin Helt                    16    – 152 Lbs.    125      95       65-R       285       331.05

Denny Habecker            75    – 192 Lbs.    110      83       66-R       259       322.29

Chris Todd                    38    – 272 Lbs.    166      141     100-R      407       309.80

Aidan Habecker             14    – 160 Lbs.     72        72       72-R       216       264.79

Chad Ullom                   46    – 247 Lbs.     95        95       95-L       285       243.50

Lance Foster                 52    – 329 Lbs.     111       85       65-R      261       205.12

Dean Ross                    75    – 236 Lbs.      65        65       30-R      160       177.88

WOMENS DIVISION

Amorkor Ollenuking     55    – 165 lbs        110       110       88         308       357.28

R.J. Jackson                56     – 105.8 Lbs.  80          65        55-R      200       325.23

Notes: All lifts recorded in pounds. R and L designate right and left arms. PTS are overall adjusted points for age and bodyweight corrections.

IAWA Lifting Etiquette

By Steve Gardner, IAWA(UK) President

After many many years of running and helping to run competitions, I have found there are a number of points that come up, time and time again, things that we get asked or confronted with, and which keep the Technical Officers and Officials on their toes. Some of it is easily answered and dealt with, some takes a little more explanation, these matters relate to us all: lifters officials and promoters…..here are some of the main points to remember and take on board with regard to competitions etc within our organisation………. Hence: Lifting Etiquette:

1 Entry Fees: competition entry fees should always be sent to and received by the Promoter at least 2 weeks before ( unless an arrangement has been made with the promoter) it is very important to those running competitions because they have to order trophies and organise premises etc to make the competition happen. If for some reason the entrant does not attend the competition a refund would not normally be paid.

2 Returning Main Trophies: it is of course very important that main awards are returned to promoters in time to be presented to the new winners, even if the past winner can not enter or be there, it is a rotten shame if a new winner is deprived of their moment of presentation because of another’s error in not returning ( it is hoped that it will be returned with engraving done also, where required)

3 Weigh In: lifters should weigh in in underwear only ( naked if it’s close on the line) it is not acceptable to have lifters trying to weigh wearing clothing? making them heavier of course, females will usually have a female weigh official, but can weigh wearing lifting costume if they wish, or need too, and an allowance of .5 kilos (half a kilo) is given.

4 it is important that lifters have joined or rejoined IAWA before being allowed to lift, it is important that promoters always remember to check this with any lifters entering their competition!

5 Attire on the platform: wrist wraps are always allowed, knee wraps / sleeves are allowed for front and back squat, no hats to be worn, shoes should always be worn, no stocking feet. Lifters can wear a lifting suit/ leotard or shorts and a t shirt, however the sleeves should finish above the elbows and shorts above knees for obvious reasons (officials need a clear view of rules of lifts being met) wearing two pairs of shorts is not allowed as can be seen as extra supportive clothing ( it has become a habit of wearing legging style shorts under regular shorts… so this is not allowed…..only underwear) also a belt can only be maximum of 4 inches wide, and wider, body hugging supportive belts cannot be worn, again one belt only is allowed . Only chalk can be used on the hands (and then, only on the hands, not legs or shoulders etc) plasters or dressings can only be worn to cover a blood wound and even then only when sanctioned by an official.

6 Questioning of Decisions by Officials: lifters should not call out from the platform to question any decision, it is crass and unprofessional… simply approach the official off the platform and ask politely…..at the appropriate moment

7 Officials position: Referees should always be sure they are in a position to see the lifting, and should move their chair or position if needs be
Also… it is unprofessional for officials to openly discuss decisions made whilst at the platform so that others in the room can hear the conversation. Better to discuss quietly between lifts, groups or sessions if necessary
Also… when using sticks and not a light system, Officials should be careful not to look at other Officials decisions before showing their own, even if done unwittingly, it looks unprofessional and as though the ref doesn’t know what signal to give
Also ……..as a centre Ref, remember to give clear audible signals. ( and visual, if it is very noisy in the room)

There may well be some points we have missed here, but I think we have most of the regular ones highlighted. IAWA is a great organisation, run by enthusiastic volunteers and lifters. As i mentioned, these points are for us all to follow : lifters promoters and officials, and if we all try to do our bit and keep these points in mind it makes the whole organisation and the running of competitions go so much smoother!

Thanks for reading these notes, hope they all make sense, lets carry on having great lifting and keep our organisation great too…..and of course ‘have great fun out there…..’

Cheers all

Memories of Jim

By John McKean

(Webmasters comments: Thank you John for sharing your memories of the late Jim Malloy. I encourage others to send me their memories of Jim as well, so I can share them on this website.)

Jim was always a warm ,loveable guy, but tried to “hide” it with his gruff, steel worker manner & “colorful” method of speaking! His subtle humor during conversation had to be experienced to appreciate it! For instance, He, Chris Waterman, and I were gabbing at a VFW meet, when Chris mentioned training since his early teens with Jim. Chris commented, “I guess I was a fairly obnoxious youth and it sure took Jim a long time to warm up to me!” Jim never changed expressions but quickly added, “No, Chris, I NEVER liked you! Not even now!” Chris’ mouth dropped open (till he realized he’d been “had” by the ole master), and the rest of us howled!

Another time, Jim showed up at a record day meet at our club, sputtering & moaning all the way down the stairway to the gym. No one had any doubt by the unique colorful phrases that it was Jim approaching. It seems that Scott Schmidt and his wife picked up Jim at his home in Cleveland that morning,telling him they were taking him shopping at a local mall, then “kidnapped” him down to Ambridge for Art’s birthday meet! Loudly complaining the entire time, Jim ignored his injuries, aches, and pains to set a bunch of records!

I think Jim got a kick out my two sons when they were lifting as pre-teens ; Sean & Rob always referred to him as that “Missing Link” guy! Certainly they’d never seen anyone that strong, gruff, and hairy !!

Joint Health Silliness

New Information on Glucosamine and Chondroitin

By Dan Wagman, Ph.D., CSCS

Back in October 2013 my publication’s Journal of Pure Power e-Newsletter provided a review of the effects of glucosamine and chondroitin (G&C) in athletes. This, because these two supplements are said to not only heal joint pain and osteoarthritis, but to even save your joints from the supposed damage coming from training and competition (that training and competition is unhealthy for your joints is an utterly absurd proposition). Our e-Newsletter used cold, hard science to debunk these beliefs but I recently had occasion to see what the latest research on the topic reveals.

Background

Glucosamine and chondroitin are compounds that your body produces naturally. Both substances are the principal substrates in the biosynthesis of cartilage, the connective tissue between your joints (though it’s found elsewhere in the body, too). The thinking is that if you supplement with G&C, then you end up with more of it, thus being able to rebuild damaged cartilage more effectively. Alternatively, supplementation in healthy people is presumed to act as a prophylactic so that the stresses from training and competition won’t even get to the point of being able to damage your joints.

Fact Check

Since we published our G&C review nearly five years ago, a lot of additional research has been conducted. What this has allowed scientists to do is conduct review studies. Look at that as studies on the studies in order to come up with a coherent bottom line. One of the things I learned is that the supplement companies have done a fantastic job of reaching out; G&C annual sales have hit $8.33 billion. As one study stated, “It appears that careless, uninformed, and scientifically inaccurate analysis of the evidence base may still occur…” A different study clarified by stating that “the safety and efficacy of supplements remain unclear and are often clouded by misinformation in mainstream media.”

One of the most recent reviews conducted a detailed mathematical analysis of the actual effects of G&C compared to the placebo effect. Here’s what they found:

In terms of improving pain, in the short-term G&C’s effects fell right between favoring the supplement and favoring placebo; in the medium-term G favored placebo and C fell right between favoring the supplement and placebo; in the long-term both G&C’s effects fell right between favoring the supplement and placebo. When it came to improving physical function, in the short-term G&C effects favored the supplement; in medium-term G favored placebo and C fell between favoring placebo and the supplement; same for long-term. With findings like that, how could anyone have any confidence in these supplements?

But there’s another issue at play, that of G&C formulations. You see, there are a lot of different formulations out there and thus it becomes very difficult to ascertain what’s what. Therefore, a different review looked at the type of G&C and their effects. This study found that only patented crystalline glucosamine sulfate was able to deliver consistently high G bioavailability. Similarly, only pharmaceutical-grade C showed any effects worth noting. These findings, however, were only related to osteoarthritis. If you don’t have that condition, supplementation with G&C remains suspect if not outright foolish.

A study coming out of the field of veterinary medicine drew some interesting conclusions that I feel apply to human consumption of G&C, too. Here, the researchers from the College of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Minnesota gave 60 dogs with osteoarthritis G&C or a placebo for 97 days. The scientists learned that G&C held no benefits for the dogs. However, despite these irrefutable findings, the dogs’ owners felt that their animals improved throughout the study period, and this for the dogs that received the supplements and those that received the placebo. To the research team this meant that there was a placebo effect even in the dog owners.

Save Your Joints…er…Wallet

The proverbial bottom line is that you can’t expect G&C to be of much benefit to your joints. And if you’ve been supplementing with it and you think it’s helping, consider the very true and measurable effect called placebo. Be smart about the fact that human nature is such that it sometimes sees an effect that’s nonexistent. The supplement industry knows this and exploits it to the tune of $8.33 billion for G&C alone. Don’t allow yourself to be duped and defrauded.

 

  1. Bruyère, O., et al. Inappropriate claims from non-equivalent medications in osteoarthritis: A position paper endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30:111–117.
  2. Liu, X., et al. Dietary supplements for treating osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:167–175.
  3. Scott, R., et al. Efficacy of an oral nutraceutical for the treatment of canine osteoarthritis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2017;5:318-323.

Passing of Jim Malloy

By Al Myers

These are the hardest blogs to write – when I have to report the death of a beloved USAWA member.  I just heard that long time USAWA member and supporter Jim Malloy has died. Jim passed away on February 27th at the age of 76.

His funeral will be on Monday, March 5th at the Blessed Trinity Church in Cleveland.  Details of this can be found at the following link: https://www.dignitymemorial.com/obituaries/cleveland-oh/james-malloy-7776583

Please share memories or stories of Jim on the USAWA Discussion Forum.  Or if you prefer just send them to me at amyers@usawa.com  I plan to take all of these memories/stories and put them into a future tribute blog about Jim, so please share.

1 151 152 153 154 155 496