FRANK’S BARBELL ANNUAL RECORD DAY -Meet results

By Coleen Lane Richardson

Meet Director: Frank Ciavattone

Meet location:  Frank’s Barbell Club, Wapole, MA

The meet was a great success by all.

The three referee system was used for all lifts.  Referees included Frank Ciavattone, Chris Lestan, Mark Raymond.

The meet was held outside due to the beautiful weather conditions.  Everyone participating met their goals, and was a highlight lifter.  The meet was followed by a barbeque.  Frank’s Barbell Club members are all looking forward to the next meet, which is July 30, 2022 (which is the postal challenge between Frank’s Barbell Club and Clark’s Gym).

Results are below.  all bodyweights and weight lifted is in pounds.  Weight class is in Kilos.

Name age weight Class division
Mike Marchand 16 170 80 kilo 16-17
Finger Lift, Left, Little 50
Finger Lift, Left, ring 85
Finger Lift, Left, middle 85
Finger Lift, Left, index 60
Deadlift, Fulton Dumbbell, Left  97
Wade Marchand 52 162 75 kilo 50-54
Deadlift, Fulton Dumbbell, Right 117
Deadlift, Fulton Dumbbell, Left 97
Jefferson Lift, Fingers, Middle 156
Vertical Bar, 1 bar, 2″, Right 150
Vertical Bar, 1 bar, 2″, Left 150
Mark Raymond 59 229 105 kilo 55-59
Deadlift, Fulton Dumbbell, Right 187
Deadlift, Fulton Dumbbell, Left 147
Rectangular Fix 95
Curl, strict, Reverse Grip 115
Dumbbell Deadlift, Right 190
Frank Ciavattone 67 276 125+ kilo 65-69
Deadlift, Fulton Dumbbell, Right 181
Deadlift, Fulton Dumbbell, Left 187
Vertical Bar, 1 bar, 2″, Left 150
Hand and Thigh 700
Hip Lift 1212

 

 

 

Leadership of the Year Award

By Eric M. Todd, Esq

Executive Board member, Beth Skwarecki presents the Leadership of the year award to Denny Habecker.

Executive Board member, Beth Skwarecki presents the Leadership of the year award to Denny Habecker.

According to the section of our website called “Past USAWA Awards,” Each year the USAWA nominates and selects individuals for special awards.  These awards are given on behalf of the USAWA for outstanding merit in several categories.”  One of these categories is the Leadership award.  One of the great things about these awards is that they are voted on by our membership.

This year’s leadership award goes to our president Denny Habecker.  Denny is an absolute stalwart in all-round at the national and international level.  He has served as our president for about 15 years.  Denny has been at every national meet since 1995 as a competitor and/or official, having won the overall national championship twice.  He frequently competes on the international stage as well.  Denny promoted our World championship in 2021.  He hosted the presidential cup, and served as our postal chairman, running all four quarterly postals. I cannot tell you how many times he has driven from Pennsylvania to God’s country to support my meets.  Well deserved, and a huge congrats to our leadership award winner, Denny Habecker!

The runner up in the leadership goes to your humble author, and Secretary/Treasurer.

Executive Board member, Beth Skwarecki presents the leadership-runner up award to Eric Todd

Executive Board member, Beth Skwarecki presents the leadership-runner up award to Eric Todd

NEW BENCH PRESS RULE IS ABSURD

By Dan Wagman, Ph.D., C.S.C.S.

IPF World Bench Press Champions and world record setters Dan Gaudreau (l) and Dan Wagman (r) would receive red lights for the new USAWA hamstring violation.

IPF World Bench Press Champions and world record setters Dan Gaudreau (l) and Dan Wagman (r) would receive red lights for the new USAWA hamstring violation.

When I submitted an edit to USAWA’s bench press rule for consideration at the most recent yearly National Meeting, my sole objective was to provide lifters with the legal means to place plates or blocks under their feet if needed. That edit would conform with internationally accepted powerlifting norms as stated in the International Powerlifting Federation (IPF) technical rules. I even submitted the wording that would most easily and directly address this—just one brief sentence. Who could have predicted that such basic wording would end up garbled to the point of rendering the rule edit absurd?
According to the Minutes, some members felt that language should be added “to make clear what the lift should look like” in an effort to avoid “distorting the lift.” As a result, the language added does exactly that—distort the lift. First, it only allows a lifter to use blocks and not plates if that’s all that’s needed. But second, it most ludicrously requires the hamstrings to remain “in contact with the bench.”
That requirement is absurd because for many lifters it’s nearly impossible to have the hamstrings remain in contact with the bench while performing a technically proficient bench press.
To be clear, the internationally accepted standards and USAWA’s original rule only call for the head, shoulders, and buttocks to be in contact with the bench. For USAWA to now require the hamstrings to also remain in contact with the bench represents a fundamental departure of decades old standards. That requirement is absurd because for many lifters it’s nearly impossible to have the hamstrings remain in contact with the bench while performing a technically proficient bench press. First, it must be understood that the hamstrings constitute a group of three different muscles at the back of the thigh. How does a lifter get muscles at the back of the thigh to maintain contact with the bench? Well, the lifter could lay at least a portion of the back of the thighs on top of the bench or perhaps squeeze the outer edges of the bench with some back That requirement is absurd because for many lifters it’s nearly impossible to have the hamstrings remain in contact with the bench while performing a technically proficient bench press. portion of the thighs. Of course if you did the former and your legs are not long enough, foot contact with the ground would be compromised. Use of a wide stance foot placement that provides optimal transfer of forces from the floor to the barbell via a solid anchor and back arch is also out because doing so rotates the back of the thighs off/away from the bench. In addition, if you consider each lifter’s unique thigh-to-leg ratios in combination with the different bench length and width dimensions you can run in to at all-round meets, a nearly infinite number

For lifters with long legs, or a bench with less height, loaders would have to place the bench on blocks…

of different block heights would be required to accommodate this new rule. Also, what if the bench length is such that a tall lifter can only place his/her head or hamstrings on the bench at the same time? Of course, for lifters with long legs, or a bench with less height, loaders would have to place the bench on blocks to accommodate the hamstring-bench-contact requirement. Frankly, “absurd” is an understatement. So, what started out as a very simple edit to the existing bench press rule ended up diverting from international norms and has turned one of the most basic tests of maximal strength into a nightmare for many lifters. How does something like this happen? With the exception of omitting the plates and blocks allowance the original USAWA rule was perfectly aligned with international standards. So perhaps the more important question is: how does the organization correct this atrocity and do so before the next meet that will contest a version of the bench press which could be any Record Day and specifically the Postal Series National Championship at the end of the year? If the organization does not make corrections, one of two things will happen: 1) meet refs will see that adhering to this rule is impossible for many lifters and will ignore it; 2) lifters like me will simply not perform the bench press and its variations. Neither choice enhances USAWA’s credibility as a strength sport.

Turning perfect bench presses into red lights. Different views of the same hamstring violation.

Turning perfect bench presses into red lights. Different views of the same hamstring violation.

A NEW ERA — ALL-ROUND’S GREATEST LIFTERS

By Dan Wagman and RJ Jackson

Back in 2016 we wrote an article titled All-Round Weightlifting’s Greatest Lifters. In that article we set out to answer a simple question: Who has set the greatest number of records in the most lifts? In all-round weightlifting this is an important question to answer as in the United States this sport contests a total of 244 different lifts if you count one-armed lifts left and right and finger lifts with each finger and thumbs as separate lifts. However, a fundamental change in how competitions are run requires us to enter a new era in answering that question.

STANDARDIZATION

For the sports scientist, the concept of standardization constitutes perhaps the most fundamental concept in sport. And of course every athlete needs to consider their sport’s level of standardization as paramount to fairness. While being such an important concept for organized sport to adhere to, standardization is rather elementary. Take USAWA’s Rulebook; it outlines not only the rules of performance for each lift but also clarifies what barbell standards should be adhered to, what sort of clothing is allowed, what sort of lifting equipment is allowed, how competitions are run, etc. Obviously, you cannot have fair competition unless everybody adheres to the same standards.

USAWA came up with a fantastic concept called Record Day competitions.

As it relates to holding meets and setting records, USAWA came up with a fantastic concept called Record Day competitions. These meets would often be held after a regular competition, on a Sunday after a normal Saturday meet, or as stand-alone meets. The sole purpose of these meets was to allow lifters to go through the record list and establish new records—and there was no limit as to how many records a lifter could set. As a result, and over many years, dedicated and strong lifters could amass hundreds of records that beginning in 2009 became recognized in the Century Club. But then the standards changed. In 2016 a new rule was approved that limits the number of lifts each competitor can set records in to only five. The standards have changed and therefore lifters no longer enjoy the same record-breaking opportunities as in years past. We have, therefore, entered a new era in which we must account for the change in standards, which your authors have done.

THE NEW ERA

In our analysis we employed USAWA’s Record List of June, 2022. In order to account for the new 5-lift Record Day limit we removed all records prior to 2017. Next we counted only one record per lift for each competitor. The reason for doing so lies within the incongruence in the rules that allows Junior and Master lifters to set two records (age group and overall) while the Senior age group, those aged 20 to 39, can only set an overall record that must exceed the record set in all other age groups. So, basically we evened the playing field best as we could in establishing who the greatest all-round lifters are in this new era.

THE GREATEST

The greatest lifter in this new era of all-round lifting in the United States is an immensely dedicated and talented lifter—Dean Ross. Despite the change in Record Day standards he amassed new records in 106 different lifts.

The greatest lifter in this new era of all-round lifting…is an immensely dedicated and talented lifter—Dean Ross.

 

Dean’s record-breaking career started in 2005 at the Dino Challenge where he competed as a Masters lifter. And we must note that in this new era of all-round records, Dean is the first to break the 100-records mark.

Contrast Dean to the leader in the Women’s division, Phoebe Todd. Phoebe’s first records appear in 2019 as a 13-year old and since then she has established records in 42 different lifts. In taking a closer look at Phoebe’s records, we have concluded that she’s a true all-rounder as her records span a wide range of lifts.

Phoebe’s first records appear in 2019 as a 13-year old and since then she has established records in 42 different lifts.

Calling her a specialist who racks up records only in her favorite movements is not an accurate way to describe this up-and-comer in all-round weightlifting. We applaud Dean and Phoebe and look forward to seeing them continue with their record-breaking efforts.

TOP 5 MEN AND WOMEN

Men

1. Dean Ross — 106

2. LaVerne Myers — 96

3. Al Myers — 89

4. Denny Habecker — 87

5. Chad Ullom — 65

Women

1. Phoebe Todd — 42

2. RJ Jackson — 33

3. Janet Thompson — 30

4. Elizabeth Skwarecki — 28

5. Amorkor Ollennuking — 21

When it comes to determining overall strength, all-round weightlifting reigns supreme among strength sports. And not only that, but you have to be dedicated for many, many years and be willing to often times learn totally new movements to excel in this sport. We challenge you to step out of your comfort zone to take on the challenge of attempting to become an All-Round Great.

 

Old Time Strongman Championship 2022

By Eric Todd

Clint Poore-Completes a big Habecker lift at the 2021 OTSM

Clint Poore-Completes a big Habecker lift at the 2021 OTSM

The 2022 edition of USAWA’s Old Time Strongman Championship is coming up!  This will be the 11th installment ever, and the 8th that we have hosted in the outskirts of glamourous Turney, MO.  There have been 8 separate male champions since its inception, with 2 lifters winning the championship twice (Chad Ullum and myself).  There have been 4 separate female champions.  Heather Tully/Gardner won on 3 separate occasions, with Phoebe Todd being the 2 time defending champion.

The lifts are different this year than last, but the atmosphere is always the same.  There is lots of iron for the capacity for big lifting. There is no heat or air conditioning.  The restroom facilities are in the form of an outhouse out back.

*this will be a drug tested event*

Location: ET’s House of Iron and Stone, Turney, MO

Date: September 10, 2022

Time 10:30 AM

weigh ins: 9:30 AM

Rules meeting: 10:00AM

Cost $25 (Make Checks out to Eric Todd)

Entries due (in hand) August 28. 2022

Lifts:

Thor’s Hammer

Lurich Lift

Anderson Press

Dinnie Lift

Awards: There will be awards at this event

Entry below:

OTSM-Entry2022

1 58 59 60 61 62 483