Tag Archives: Rulebook

Rulebook available on Amazon

8.5x11" rulebook, open to the page with the hang snatch, Kelly snatch, and snatch on knees

To those who enjoy having a physical copy of their books, I am pleased to announce that the 13th (current) edition of the USAWA Rulebook is now available for purchase on Amazon. If you search “USAWA Rulebook” it will pop right up, and you can order a copy for $9.99.

The Amazon version of the rulebook is print-on-demand, meaning that USAWA did not have to front money for a print run, nor will anybody have to store copies of the book or take the time to ship orders. The purchase price is cheaper than we have been able to offer previous printed rulebooks, and as a bonus the USAWA bank account nets $2.78 per copy. The photos included here are of the proof copy; the final copy will not include the “not for resale” banner that you can see across the cover.

The Rulebook is still available in PDF format on our Rulebook page for free, and if you prefer to print your own copy, you are still welcome to do so. I am working on formatting an ebook version that can be purchased on Kindle or loaded onto the e-reader of your choice.

So tell your friends, and order a copy for yourself if you would like. I’m told that reviews on the Amazon website are helpful in keeping books available and easy to find, so consider giving it an honest review (it deserves five stars, right?) if you’re so inclined.

Rulebook – 12th Edition

The 12th edition of the Rulebook has been published. This includes all rule changes, bylaw changes, and new lifts from the 2024, 2023, and 2022 national meetings.

Notable changes include:

  • Tank tops are now allowed in competition.
  • Knee sleeves are still disallowed on most lifts, but they are now allowed on the three lifts (Anderson squat, front squat, 12″ base squat) that allow knee wraps.
  • Official scoring now uses a gender adjustment (same as IAWA scoring) so that men and women can be ranked together.
  • Secretary and Treasurer roles have been separated into two positions.
  • Aspiring officials may use up to 2 video tests to achieve their 3 required practical sessions (one in-person session is still required).
  • Level 1 officials may substitute up to 15 meets from other organizations such as USA Weightlifting or USA Powerlifting toward their 25-meet qualification for Level 2.
  • Meets may be held remotely or hybrid, at the meet director’s discretion. This does not apply to the National Championship.
  • The host of the National Meeting may choose to allow virtual attendance.
  • The minimum size of a platform is now 8×8 feet (not 8×12).
  • Blocks or plates may be used under a lifter’s feet on bench presses.
  • The membership fee, after many years at $25, has been increased to $35.

New lifts include:

  • Bavarian deadlift (2024)
  • Bench press, 2 dumbbells (2024)
  • Jefferson finger lifts (2022)
  • Saxon deadlift (2024) – note that this uses a metal saxon bar, different from the wooden one used for the Saxon snatch.

Updated Rulebook

By Al Myers

I just finished updating the USAWA Rulebook with the rule changes made by the membership over the past few years. it was last updated in 2017.  It now contains the rules for the new lifts that have been added since that time – the Lurich Lift, the Rim Lift, and the Habecker Lift.

The new USAWA Rulebook is the 11th Edition.  It is available for free download on the USAWA website.

Rulebook Updates

By Al Myers

I have just added an addendum page to the Rulebook section which contains the new rule and lift information that was passed and approved at the 2018 USAWA National Meeting.  Since there was only minimal changes to the current 10th Edition USAWA Rulebook I felt it was wasn’t necessary to make a new edition rulebook this year.

The rules for the 2 new lifts approved this year (the Lurich Lift and the Habecker Lift) are included in the addendum.   Also, it contains a minor rule change for the proper loading of the Thor’s Hammer.

Please just print off the addendum page and add it to your current rulebook.

New Proposed Lifts

By Al Myers

Recently in the USAWA Discussion Forum there’s been talk of new lifts.  That’s what inspired me to write the blog the other day on the rules involving new lift approval. We have rules into place that make sure any new lift in the USAWA is considered a “good lift”, with proper written rules in place BEFORE it is proposed.  Which has not been the policy in the old days – thus why there are so many strange official rules and lifts in our Rulebook.

I’m in the mood to do a little rambling today about my opinion on all this. Of course, these are just my opinions and may not represent the viewpoints of others on the Executive Board.  The USAWA has MANY more official lifts than the IAWA(UK). What’s considered official IAWA lifts is generally what is in the IAWA(UK) Rulebook. I tend to agree with this, because unlike the USAWA, the IAWA(UK) only considers “new lifts” as those passed at the AGM of the IAWA while the USAWA proposes and accepts new lifts at our USAWA meeting which only represents the USAWA.  The IAWA(UK) does not accept new lifts at their IAWA(UK) annual meeting.  The ARWLWA primarly uses the IAWA(UK) Rulebook as their official rulebook, but does use the USAWA Rulebook for the OTSM lifts.  So to sum it up, the USAWA has official lifts that the IAWA(UK) does not.

What do I consider in voting on a new proposed lift?  Simply put I look at THREE THINGS before casting my vote.

1. Is it a new, novel lift?

What’s the point of passing a new lift that is just a knockoff of a lift we already have.  Here’s an example of a lift I wouldn’t be in favor of – say – the heels together Ciavattone Grip Deadlift.  We already have the Ciavattone Grip Deadlift, and we already have the heels together deadlift.  I just don’t see the point of combining these. After all, anytime a Ciavattone Grip is used it comes down to grip strength anyways. I don’t have a problem with a “one deviation” difference from a traditional lift, but after that it just becomes confusing and redundant.  I won’t even get started venting about the Lano Lift.  That’s a story in itself how that lift got passed!

2. Does it represent an old time All Round Weightlifting movement or lift?

Our mission statement has always stated that the USAWA “strives to preserve the history of the original forms of weightlifting”.  I hope we never forget this, as I feel that is the purpose of our organization.  If you’re interested in the “new age” strength lifts, go compete in cross fit. That’s not what we are about.

3. Is it a lift that can be performed properly by the majority of our members?

We already have enough “trick lifts” and “pet lifts” in our Rulebook. We don’t need more.  I understand that the USAWA gives opportunity to express hidden strengths in obscure lifts, but enough is enough.  I understand why the Van Dam Lift got approved (it was for a personal publicity stunt which we agreed to participate in, hoping it would give us some exposure), but come on, that’s a ridiculous lift to have in our Rulebook.  I can think of over  50 new lifts that we could have that would be better than that one! I feel any new USAWA official lift should be one that at least over 50 percent of lifters can perform.

On the IAWA front the USAWA has always been very open to new lifts, more so than the rest of the IAWA crowd.  I could state my reasons why I think that is so – but won’t publically as I know I would offend some people.  I do know some think we have enough All Round lifts in “the books” now, but if a new lift is proposed that is good I am all for it.  Maybe we should get rid of some official USAWA lifts? Again that is a story for another day!

 

1 2